• Raised concerns about bias, transparency, privacy, public safety, and deception with ChatGPT/GPT-4
• Detailed specific harms in each of these areas that OpenAI acknowledged could occur with GPT-4
• Cited OpenAI's own statements, research papers, and system cards that warned about risks
• Argued OpenAI released GPT-4 despite knowing about risks, violating FTC guidance
• Supplement to Complain

• Highlighted global investigations launched in Italy, Canada, France, Australia, Germany, Spain, and the EU
• Pointed to calls for regulation and pause on deployment from experts worldwide
• Noted increased public concern about generative AI safety
• Flagged new cybersecurity, privacy, and democracy threats posed by ChatGPT

• Seeks information on bias, transparency, privacy, safety, and deception risks
• Asks for details on what consumer complaints OpenAI has received
• Requests info on how personal data is used and protected
• Inquires about policies, procedures, and reviews related to model development
• Questions what steps OpenAI takes to filter, audit, and moderate model outputs
• Aligns with original complaint areas and supplement details on emerging issues 

In summary, the investigation document closely traces the main issues and concerns outlined in the original CAIDP complaint and supplement. It shows the FTC is taking seriously the potential for consumer harm and illegality identified by CAIDP. The document signals a comprehensive inquiry aimed at gathering evidence on the key areas CAIDP argued require investigation of OpenAI's practices.

WASHINGTON DC - The Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) has escalated its case against OpenAI, creator of the ChatGPT AI product, by filing a supplementto the original complaint lodged with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in March 2023, accusing OpenAI of "unfair and deceptive practices." This CAIDP action introduces new developments in the global debate over ChatGPT and increases pressure on the FTC to expedite an investigation.

ChatGPT has been the center of numerous investigations from consumer agencies around the world since the original CAIDP complaint. Many of these international investigations have resulted in concrete actions and heightened oversight on OpenAI, with several having implications for how AI should be regulated.

"The continued global focus on regulating AI products such as ChatGPT only emphasizes the need for immediate action from the FTC," said Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director for CAIDP. "While other countries have taken swift action, the FTC has yet to acknowledge the first complaint made by CAIDP, raising concerns about the agency's ability to address the pressing issues that are emerging from the rapidly evolving AI industry."

In response to mounting concerns over the ethical implications and the regulatory needs of such AI products, regulatory agencies in Italy, Canada, France, Australia, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, the U.K., and Japan, have initiated investigations and legal proceedings against OpenAI.

The supplement to the original CAIDP complaint outlines these international efforts, sheds light on newly surfaced issues not fully captured in the initial complaint, such as risks to democracy, and calls attention to statements by FTC Commissioners that the agency would act to safeguard consumers from the harms of unregulated AI products.

With growing public support for AI product regulation, expert opinions, bipartisan AI legislation proposed by the Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and President Biden's calls for ensuring product safety before public deployment, CAIDP reaffirms its commitment to pressuring the FTC for urgent intervention.

CAIDP Supplement, In the Matter of Open AI (July 10, 2023)

• On March 6, 2023, CAIDPs' Marc Rotenberg and Merve Hickok published a letter in The New York Times "Regulating AI: The US Needs to Act." They wrote, "The recent coverage of Washington’s response to artificial intelligence is a welcome shift toward an overdue policy debate. But the challenge ahead is not so much about educating lawmakers about new technology as it is about establishing the necessary safeguards to protect the public."

• On March 8, 2023, CAIDP's Merve Hickok testified before the U.S. Congress. She stated, "We do not have the guardrails in place, the laws that we need, the public education, or the expertise in government to manage the consequences of the rapid changes that are now taking place."

• On March 20, 2023, Merve Hickok and Marc Rotenberg, wrote  a public letter, stating that CAIDP will file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, "calling for an investigation of Open AI and the product chatGPT." They explained,  "We believe the FTC has the authority to act in this matter and is uniquely positioned as the lead consumer protection agency in the United States to address this emerging challenge. We will ask the FTC to establish a moratorium on the release of further commercial versions of GPT until appropriate safeguards are established."

• On March 30, 2023, CAIDP filed a 46-page complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. The Center asked the Commission to begin an investigation of OpenAI and to prevent the release of further models until necessary guardrails are established. In a letter to the FTC Commissioners, Marc Rotenberg and Merve Hickok reminded the Commission that they previously declared that AI products should be “transparent, explainable, fair, and empirically sound while fostering accountability.”

• On April 4, 2023, President Biden, meeting with his top science advisors, explained the need to address the potential risks of AI to society, the economy, and national security. He called for "responsible innovation and appropriate guardrails to protect America’s rights and safety, and protecting their privacy, and to address the bias and disinformation." He  said "tech companies have a responsibility to make sure their products are safe before making them public."

• On April 6, 2023, CAIDP releases AI and Democratic Values,  a comprehensive review of AI policies and practices in 75 countries. In the United States country report, CAIDP notes that the Federal Trade Commission has set out guidelines for businesses offering AI products, but also warns that "the Federal Trade Commission has failed to act on several pending complaints concerning the deployment of AI techniques in the commercial sector." (Page 1085).

• On April 11, 2023, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce announced an oversight hearing for the Federal Trade Commission for Tuesday, April 18, 2023, to review the agency's program and budget request for FY2024.

• Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP), Complaint and Request for Investigation, Injunction, and Other Relief, Submitted to the Federal Trade Commission, March 30, 2023 

• Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP), Press Release, AI POLICY ORGANIZATION URGES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE OPENAI AND SUSPEND FURTHER SALE OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL PRODUCTS, SUCH AS GPT-4; FILES FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH FTC; Center for AI and Digital Policy Says OpenAI Violated Section 5 of the FTC Act, FTC Guidance for AI Products, and Rules for Governance of AI, March 30, 2023 

• Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP), Letter to Chair Kahn, Commissioner Slaughter, Commissioner Wilson, and Commissioner Bedoya,  March 30, 2023

20 March 2023

Dear Friends

In 2019, many countries around the world, including the United States, committed to the development of human-centric and trustworthy AI. Yet less than a few years on, we appear to be approaching a tipping point with the release of Generative AI techniques, which are neither human-centric nor trustworthy. 

These systems produce results that cannot be replicated or proven. They fabricate and hallucinate. They describe how to commit terrorist acts, how to assassinate political leaders, and how to conceal child abuse.  GPT-4 has the ability to undertake mass surveillance at scale, combining the ability to ingest images, link to identities, and develop comprehensive profiles.

As this industry has rapidly evolved so too has the secrecy surrounding the products. The latest technical paper on GPT-4 provides little information about the training data, the number of parameters, or the assessment methods. A fundamental requirement in all emerging AI policy frameworks – an independent impact assessment prior to deployment – was never undertaken. 

Many leading AI experts, including many companies themselves, have called for regulation. Yet there is little effort in the United States today to develop regulatory responses even as countries around the world race to establish legal safeguards. 

The present course cannot be sustained. The public needs more information about the impact of artificial intelligence. Independent experts need the opportunity to interrogate these models. Laws should be enacted to promote algorithmic transparency and counter algorithmic bias. There should be a national commission established to assess the impact of AI on American Society, to better understand the benefits as well as the risks.

This week the Center for AI and Digital Policy, joined by others, will file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, calling for an investigation of Open AI and the product chatGPT.  We believe the FTC has the authority to act in this matter and is uniquely positioned as the lead consumer protection agency in the United States to address this emerging challenge. We will ask the FTC to establish a moratorium on the release of further commercial versions of GPT until appropriate safeguards are established. We will simultaneously petition the FTC to undertake a rulemaking for the regulation of the generative AI industry. 

We favor growth and innovation. We recognize a wide range of opportunities and benefits that AI may provide. But unless we are able to maintain control of these systems, we will be unable to manage the risk that will result or the catastrophic outcomes that may emerge. We are asking the FTC to “hit the pause button” so that there is an opportunity for our institutions, our laws, and our society to catch up. We need to assert agency over the technologies we create before we lose control. 

Merve Hickock and Marc Rotenberg

For the CAIDP 

Over the last several years, the FTC has issued several reports and policy guidelines concerning marketing and advertising of AI-relate products and services. We believe that OpenAI should be required by the FTC to comply with these guidelines.

When you talk about AI in your advertising, the FTC may be wondering, among other things:

• Are you exaggerating what your AI product can do? 
• Are you promising that your AI product does something better than a non-AI product?
• Are you aware of the risks?
• Does the product actually use AI at all?

[More information]

In 2021, the FTC warned that advances in Artificial Intelligence  "has highlighted how apparently “neutral” technology can produce troubling outcomes – including discrimination by race or other legally protected classes." The FTC explained it has decades of experience enforcing three laws important to developers and users of AI:

• Section 5 of the FTC Act
• Fair Credit Reporting Act
• Equal Credit Opportunity Act

The FTC said its recent work on AI – coupled with FTC enforcement actions – offers important lessons on using AI truthfully, fairly, and equitably.

• Start with the right foundation
• Watch out for discriminatory outcomes
• Embrace transparency and independenc
• Don’t exaggerate what your algorithm can do or whether it can deliver fair or unbiased results
• Tell the truth about how you use data
• Do more good than harm
• Hold yourself accountable – or be ready for the FTC to do it for you

[More information]

" . . . we at the FTC have long experience dealing with the challenges presented by the use of data and algorithms to make decisions about consumers. Over the years, the FTC has brought many cases alleging violations of the laws we enforce involving AI and automated decision-making, and have investigated numerous companies in this space.

"The FTC’s law enforcement actions, studies, and guidance emphasize that the use of AI tools should be transparent, explainable, fair, and empirically sound, while fostering accountability. We believe that our experience, as well as existing laws, can offer important lessons about how companies can manage the consumer protection risks of AI and algorithms."

• Be transparent.
• • Don’t deceive consumers about how you use automated tools
  • Be transparent when collecting sensitive data
  • If you make automated decisions based on information from a third-party vendor, you may be required to provide the consumer with an “adverse action” notice
• Explain your decision to the consumer.
• • If you deny consumers something of value based on algorithmic decision-making, explain why
  • If you use algorithms to assign risk scores to consumers, also disclose the key factors that affected the score, rank ordered for importance
  • If you might change the terms of a deal based on automated tools, make sure to tell consumers.
• Ensure that your decisions are fair.
• • Don’t discriminate based on protected classes.
  • Focus on inputs, but also on outcomes
  • Give consumers access and an opportunity to correct information used to make decisions about them
• Ensure that your data and models are robust and empirically sound.
• Hold yourself accountable for compliance, ethics, fairness, and nondiscrimination.

FTC Report Warns About Using Artificial Intelligence to Combat Online Problems

Agency Concerned with AI Harms Such As Inaccuracy, Bias, Discrimination, and Commercial Surveillance Creep (June 16, 2022)

Today the Federal Trade Commission issued a report to Congress warning about using artificial intelligence (AI) to combat online problems and urging policymakers to exercise “great caution” about relying on it as a policy solution. The use of AI, particularly by big tech platforms and other companies, comes with limitations and problems of its own. The report outlines significant concerns that AI tools can be inaccurate, biased, and discriminatory by design and incentivize relying on increasingly invasive forms of commercial surveillance.

On March 4, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission announced the settlement of a case against a company that had improperly collected children's data. Notably, the FTC required the company to destroy the data and any algorithms derived from the data.

• FTC Takes Action Against Company Formerly Known as Weight Watchers for Illegally Collecting Kids’ Sensitive Health Data: WW International and its Kurbo App are required to delete data, destroy any algorithms, and pay a monetary penalty (March 4, 2022)

On May 7, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission announced the settlement of a case with the developer of a photo app that allegedly deceived consumers about its use of facial recognition technology and its retention of the photos and videos of users who deactivated their accounts. Notably, the FTC required the company to delete the photos and videos of users who deactivated their accounts and the models and algorithms the companies developed.

• FTC Finalizes Settlement with Photo App Developer Related to Misuse of Facial Recognition Technology (May 7, 2021)